Do Politicians Grant Favors to Donors? A Field Experiment on Campaign Contributions and Access to Congressional Officials∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
Scholars, jurists, and citizens have long been concerned with the question of whether donations lead to an undue distortion of lawmakers’ behavior. After decades of research, methodological shortcomings have prevented a clearer understanding of the role of campaign donations on political outcomes from emerging. I begin with a methodological critique of observational research’s attempts to answer causal questions and then report the first randomized field experiment to investigate the effect of campaign contributions on access to congressional officials. A political organization attempted to schedule meetings between 191 Members of Congress and groups of their constituents who had donated to political campaigns. However, the organization randomly assigned whether it informed legislators’ offices that the requested meeting would be with previous donors. The revealed donors gained considerably more access to senior congressional officials than those thought to be only constituents. These findings have important implications for ongoing legal and legislative debates.
منابع مشابه
Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment
Concern that donations to political campaigns secure preferential treatment from policy makers has long occupied judges, scholars, and the public. However, the effects of contributions on policy makers’ behavior are notoriously difficult to assess. We present the first randomized field experiment on the topic. The experiment focuses on whether contributions facilitate access to influential poli...
متن کاملAn Experimental Study of Alternative Campaign Finance Systems : Donations , Elections and Policy Choices
We experimentally study the effect of alternative campaign finance systems – as characterized by different information structure about donors – on donations, election outcomes, political candidates' policy choices, and welfare. Three alternative campaign finance systems are considered: a full anonymity (FA) system in which neither the politicians nor the voters are informed about the donors' id...
متن کاملInvestment in Politicians? Evidence from the 1994 Elections
Political organizations and elected officials are often viewed as developing long-term alliances. Given this view, it is alleged that groups should invest in politicians by providing consistent support over time in exchange for increasing returns as elected officials find their careers advancing. Others question this view and assert that politicians and groups leaders have far shorter time hori...
متن کاملMoney, Political Ambition, and the Career Decisions of Politicians*
In this paper we assess the impact of a variety of policies that may influence the career decisions of members of the U.S. Congress, using the empirical framework of Diermeier, Keane and Merlo (2005). These policies alter incentives to run for re-election, run for higher office or leave Congress, by altering wages, non-pecuniary rewards and career prospects (both in and out of Congress). We fin...
متن کاملCaps on
The cost of political campaigns in the U.S. has risen substantially in recent years. For example, real spending on congressional election campaigns doubled between 1976 and 1992 (Steven D. Levitt [1995]). There are many reasons why increased campaign spending might be socially harmful. First, increased spending means increased fund-raising, which may keep politicians from their legislative duti...
متن کامل